We noticed you’re blocking ads

Thanks for visiting CRSToday. Our advertisers are important supporters of this site, and content cannot be accessed if ad-blocking software is activated.

In order to avoid adverse performance issues with this site, please white list https://crstoday.com in your ad blocker then refresh this page.

Need help? Click here for instructions.

Digital Supplement | Editorially independent content supported by Allergan

Improvements in OSD and DED Management

A roundtable discussion exploring turning points in standards of care.

INTRODUCTION

James Katz, MD: Dry eye disease (DED) is a complex and multifactorial condition that affects at least 38 million individuals in the United States alone. Of these, only 18 million are diagnosed cases and 1.2 million are treated with prescription medication.1-3 DED management therefore can be an effective practice builder, as many individuals are undertreated. Today, treatment approaches and how we diagnose and identify patients with DED and ocular surface disease (OSD) continue to evolve as our understanding of its underlying mechanisms deepens. The aim of our discussion is to review major milestones in OSD and DED management that have helped shape and define modern treatment strategies.

Marguerite B. McDonald, MD, FACS: The first treatment for DED was simply heavily preserved salt water. Over time, artificial tear formulations became much more sophisticated in composition.

Karl G. Stonecipher, MD: Ointments were another early option. Although they last longer than artificial tears, they cause blurring of vision.

Dr. McDonald: People hated them back then, and they still dislike them. Ointment remains an important part of my treatment algorithm, but only for moderate to severe cases, and I prescribe it for use at night.

Kendall E. Donaldson, MD, MS: Twenty years ago, when I did my residency and cornea fellowship, we didn’t talk much about DED because of the lack of treatment options. We’ve come such a long way since then, and the depth of options we have is incredible. We also weren’t talking about preservatives 20 years ago, and that is a big discussion I have with every patient now because it may be a component of their problem. I really want patients to understand how important the health of their ocular surface is.

Inder Paul Singh, MD: Coming out of fellowship 20 years ago, the glaucoma meetings I attended focused on IOP control. No one talked about the patient’s quality of life, symptomatology, drop compliance, or DED management. Now we know the toxicity and preservatives in eye drops can wreak havoc on a patient with underlying OSD.1 When symptoms get worse, compliance gets worse. It’s amazing to see how reducing topical drops for our patients has increased their quality of life. Additionally, our ability to maintain their IOP control over time has gotten so much better by just adding DED symptomatology and management. They trust us as providers more now because we address and understand why they have their symptoms. It is a 180º shift in glaucoma management.

Dr. Katz: One of the first things I tell patients is to please stay on label and not buy generics.

Dr. McDonald: Agreed. There is less control over the excipients in generic drops and the consistency of how they are produced.

Cathleen M. McCabe, MD: And they may change over time, too. When I was in training, punctal plugs and artificial tears were the two treatment options. Artificial tears, punctal plugs, and warm compresses are all important adjunct therapies, but now I treat more of the inflammatory portion of the disease process.

A SIGNIFICANT TURNING POINT

Dr. Katz: It wasn’t until the early 2000s that we finally had a prescription eye drop specifically approved for the treatment of DED, cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis, AbbVie/Allergan). The drop created a space in DED treatment with immunomodulation to help reduce inflammation and improve tear production. It quickly elevated the dry eye market for eye care providers. Today, Restasis is still among the top prescribed drugs in all of eye care.

Dr. McCabe: Restasis was a revolution because suddenly we had an interest in not only identifying DED, but trying to do something about it. We started talking to patients more openly about DED. It was really a revolution in dry eye treatment.

Dr. Singh: Patients started experiencing a wow factor, and I think the lightbulb moment for me was seeing an improvement in goblet cell density reported in clinical studies.2-4 The biggest change for me as a noncornea specialist was to realize I should be treating DED as early as possible to cut the inflammatory response, even in the context of glaucoma.

Dr. Donaldson: Anytime we don’t have a good treatment for a condition, it’s hard to have a meaningful conversation with patients. Restasis really opened the door to start asking patients if they have symptoms.

Dr. McDonald: We went from ignoring people’s complaints about dry eye because we couldn’t do anything about it to identifying those with clinically significant DED who don’t have symptoms yet. Now, we’re trying to convince those who are getting ready for LASIK or cataract surgery that we must treat an important condition for which they’re asymptomatic.

Dr. Katz: It took us several years to educate the population on the importance of DED diagnosis and treatment. Eventually, other immunomodulators (lifitegrast ophthalmic solution 5% [Xiidra, Novartis] and cyclosporine ophthalmic solution 0.09% [Cequa, Sun Ophthalmics]) came along and added to our opportunity to prescribe treatment to DED patients. But it was the class of immunomodulators that started to change the way we treat dry eye as an inflammatory condition.

INTERVENING EARLY

Dr. Katz: There have been other advances in DED therapy. In 2011, we started applying heat and pressure to the eyelids to address the evaporative component and the meibomian glands, which are responsible for maintaining tear film stability. This was a significant advance in OSD therapy.

Dr. Stonecipher: I’ve been doing intense pulsed light and low level light treatments for more than 2 decades. There’s been a lot of evolution in terms of devices, but we must still think about the basics: How do we keep tears from evaporating too quickly, and how do we help patients make better quality tears? There are so many co-conspirators, including rosacea, floppy eyelid disease, lid wiper epitheliopathy, and even the environment.

Dr. McCabe: We have learned how important it is to intervene early for meibomian gland dysfunction to preserve the glands before they atrophy. Honestly, dry eye permeates our entire clinic day. Every patient has a little aspect of it. Now, we have our technicians elicit patients’ DED symptoms before we as surgeons even touch the eye.

Dr. Stonecipher: I agree. We’re more prophylactic as opposed to reactive.

Dr. McCabe: That’s where educational tools like meibography, tear osmolarity, LipiView (Johnson & Johnson Vision), and iTrace (Tracey Technologies) can help the patient understand their condition.

Dr. Donaldson: Patients relate to imagery, and it helps with compliance because a lot of the procedures and medications that we use don’t make an instant difference. Getting patients to partner with us is helpful.

Dr. Katz: Another point is just how early DED starts. Teenagers and people in their 20s are developing significant gland dropout, largely due to the increased use of digital devices.

Dr. McDonald: The normal blink rate is 20 times per minute. It drops down to 3.6 times per minute when using any digital device.5

MYRIAD TREATMENT OPTIONS

Dr. Katz: We now also have topical steroids like loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension 0.25% (Eysuvis, Kala Pharmaceuticals) and novel treatments like varenicline solution nasal spray 0.03 mg (Tyrvaya, Viatris). How have these contributed to your ability to manage patients’ symptoms?

Dr. McCabe: Some patients cannot be successful with drops. Maybe they have a tremor or they have arthritis. Having a drop-free option is a wonderful alternative. As far as topical steroids, they are especially useful for patients with a lot of active dryness to be compliant with using an immunomodulator.

Dr. McDonald: The three times that I often use steroids are induction therapy for the immunomodulators, flare-ups, and for one week after combined BlephEx/LipiFlow treatment.

Dr. Singh: It gives eye care providers who maybe aren’t as comfortable treating DED more confidence being able to prescribe steroids now that it’s on label for that indication.

Dr. Stonecipher: Another new agent is perfluorohexyloctane ophthalmic solution (Miebo, Bausch + Lomb), which is 100% active ingredient. It’s great to have so many options for both the evaporative and aqueous components of DED because now we can ensure patients have a treatment that will work and be agreeable to them. Now, we also have lotilaner ophthalmic solution 0.25% (Xdemvy, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals) to treat Demodex blepharitis. This is another treatment that’s leading us down a path to where we can finally treat patients with a specific condition.

STANDARDIZING TREATMENT ALGORITHMS

Dr. Katz: Kendall, what can you tell us about The Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) Dry Eye Workshop Reports (DEWS)?

Dr. Donaldson: TFOS DEWS was also a turning point. It standardized a treatment algorithm for doctors to follow. Then, ASCRS and Cedars Aspens created algorithms, but all of them overlapped to some degree. Having a more standardized approach to managing complex patients is crucial. We’re so fortunate to have both procedures and medications, but knowing how to put it all together can be overwhelming.

Elizabeth Yeu, MD: Each algorithm provides something unique. Specific to the TFOS DEWS I algorithm, it provided us guidance finally on how to manage DED and OSD patients with various severity levels of disease (eg, mild, moderate, severe) for the first time by evaluating them and treating them beyond tears.

Dr. Singh: TFOS helped validate that dry eye is a disease, not just a symptom (see the accompanying sidebar for information on the TFOS Lifestyle Report).

Dr. Stonecipher: I think it’s also important to enable your staff. They should know about the DED treatment algorithm and how to assess patients with a questionnaire. We use a new artificial intelligence questionnaire, CSIdryeye.com. It’s 50 questions about a patient’s medication use, lifestyle, and environment, to name a few. One of my staff members talks to patients about their results even before I see the patient.

Dr. Katz: How do others identify DED patients in their practices?

Dr. Donaldson: Screening tests. My staff uses the Ocular Surface Disease Index and matrix metallopeptidase 9. If they have at least two things that are indicative of OSD, then we order a topography or meibography.

Dr. Yeu: I no longer see specific dry eye evaluations, only surgical evaluations. But we must remember, every surgery evaluation must be evaluated for lid margin and dry eye disease. For me, an infrared meibography is an absolute must for every surgical evaluation because it gives a snapshot in time of their baseline meibomian gland architecture and their “reserve”, if you will. Certain modern risk factors, such as overuse of digital devices or contact lenses, and even what their diet is like, well before ever coming in for the surgical evaluation, can truly destroy MG structure, creating a lack of any reserve or tolerance to potential contrast sensitivity loss of other insults to the ocular surface. I also use the placido topography to observe specifically at the quality of the mires, and I evaluate for inter-device consistency between the average K values, amount of astigmatism and the steep meridian. If there are significant differences between devices, evaporative dry eye disease can definitely lead to the etiology. I also evaluate the tear breakup time (TBUT) and the quality of the tear film. Lastly, I look at their face for rosacea, their brows for flakes, and their lid for debris, such as collarettes at the base of the upper lashes, that would be indicative of Demodex blepharitis. I push on the lower lids to test the quality of the meibum.

Dr. Katz: Does anyone look beyond the evaporative component and distortion in the topographical mires, like inflammatory or osmolarity testing for the aqueous component?

Dr. Singh: I use the iTrace, but also I think symptomatology is important. Listening to patients describe their symptoms is a powerful tool. And again, techs should be trained to ask those questions.

Dr. McDonald: I use almost exactly the same protocol as Kendall. Our techs use the SPEED questionnaire, and they get a tear osmolarity. If it is 317 mOsm/L or higher, then topography and meibography are ordered. For preoperative patients, if the topography or meibography are also abnormal, all testing is halted until I meet and greet the patient, explain that they have OSD, and recommend a treatment plan. Thanks to newer agents, the patient can come back in 2 to 4 weeks for the rest of their preoperative workup, and the biometry will be more accurate.

Dr. Katz: Let’s talk briefly about treatment for neurotrophic keratitis (NK).

Dr. McCabe: The evolution of NK is interesting. Over the past 5 to 7 years since cenegermin-bkbj ophthalmic solution 0.002% (Oxervate, Dompé) was approved, we’re seeing the condition more and more. It usually takes two visits to diagnose NK because corneal cessation must be checked before they undergo a diagnostic workup.

Dr. Katz: So when do you consider using amniotic membrane?

Dr. Yeu: We’ve been using it more. I always start with Oxervate, but a lot of times I end up using a self-retaining amniotic membrane as well. My mindset on artificial lubrication has changed completely, too. Artificial lubrication is no longer just palliative, it is therapeutic. All the medicines that are being approved today are based on signs and symptoms. How can we say that the ingredients that are in tears today do not improve signs and symptoms? Artificial tears, especially those that are emollient-based, improve tear breakup time.

Dr. McCabe: I love serum tears. Because this treatment is not covered by insurance, however, it’s access dependent. I use scleral lenses as well for patients with graft-versus-host disease. I think the combination of scleral lenses and serum tears in patients with severe disease is extremely effective. The scleral lens represents yet another landmark improvement in dry eye management.

CONCLUSION

Dr. Katz: We’ve talked about so many important treatment advances in this discussion, and it’s clear to see how much DED management has evolved in the past few decades. From the introduction of Restasis as the first approved treatment for DED to modern ongoing advances, DED treatment is being elevated to new heights.

Patient education and applying standardized treatment algorithms remain paramount. Today, we can offer patients personalized approaches to treating DED, and this starts with empowering your staff to assist in the diagnosis and management process. We all look forward to trialing new and exciting DED treatment modalities in the future.

1. Kolko M, Gazzard G, Baudouin C, et al. Impact of glaucoma medications on the ocular surface and how ocular surface disease can influence glaucoma treatment. Ocul Surf. June 9, 2023. [Epub ahead of print].

2. Pflugfelder SC, De Paiva CS, Villarreal AL, et al. Effects of sequential artificial tear and cyclosporine emulsion therapy on conjunctival goblet cell density and transforming growth factor-beta2 production. Cornea. 2008;(1):64-69.

3. Sall K, Stevenson OD, Mundorf TK, et al. Two multicenter, randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in moderate to severe dry eye disease. CsA Phase 3 Study Group. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(4):631-639.

4. Kunert KS, Tisdale AS, Gipson IK. Goblet cell numbers and epithelial proliferation in the conjunctiva of patients with dry eye syndrome treated with cyclosporine. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(3):330-337.

5. Patel S, Henderson R, Bradley L, Galloway B, Hunter L. Effect of visual display unit use on blink rate and tear stability. Optom Vis Sci. 1991;68(11):888-892.

author
James Katz, MD
  • Cataract, cornea, and refractive surgeon, The Midwest Center for Sight, Chicago
  • Director, Golf Laser Vision, Chicago
  • jkatz@tmcfs.com
  • Financial disclosures: Consultant (AbbVie/Allergan, Alcon, Bausch + Lomb, Dompé, Novartis, Sight Sciences, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Trukera)
author
Kendall E. Donaldson, MD, MS
  • Professor of Clinical Ophthalmology, Cornea/External Disease/Refractive Surgery, and Medical Director, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Plantation, Florida
  • kdonaldson@med.miami.edu
  • Financial disclosures: Consultant (AbbVie/Allergan, Alcon, Bausch + Lomb, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dompé, Eyevance Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Kala Pharmaceuticals, Lensar, Lumenis, Omeros, Oyster Point Pharma, PRN, Quidel, Science Based Health, Sun Ophthalmics, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Tissue Tech/BioTissue, Verséa Ophthalmics)
author
Cathleen M. McCabe, MD
  • Cataract and refractive surgery specialist and Medical Director, The Eye Associates, Bradenton and Sarasota, Florida
  • cmccabe13@hotmail.com; X (formerly Twitter) @cathyeye
  • Financial disclosure: Consultant (AbbVie/Allergan, Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Alcon, Bausch + Lomb, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dompé, Easee, Engage Technologies Group, Eyevance, Glaukos, ImprimisRx, iStar Medical, Ivantis, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Lensar, Novartis, Ocular Therapeutix, Orasis, Science Based Health, Quidel, RxSight, Sight Sciences, Spyglass, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Surface Pharma, Tarsus, Trefoil, Visus)
author
Marguerite B. McDonald, MD, FACS
  • Director of the Dry Eye Center of Excellence, Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island, Westbury, New York
  • Clinical Professor of Ophthalmology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York
  • Clinical Professor of Ophthalmology, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans
  • margueritemcdmd@aol.com
  • Financial disclosure: None acknowledged
author
Inder Paul Singh, MD
  • The Eye Centers of Racine & Kenosha, Wisconsin
  • ipsingh@amazingeye.com
  • Financial disclosures: Consultant (AbbVie/Allergan, Glaukos, Ivantis, New World Medical, Nova Eye Medical, NICOX, iStar Medical, Sight Sciences)
author
Karl G. Stonecipher, MD
  • Clinical Professor of Ophthalmology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
  • Clinical Adjunct Professor of Ophthalmology, Tulane University, New Orleans
  • Director of Refractive Surgery, Laser Defined Vision, Greensboro, North Carolina
  • stonenc@gmail.com
  • Financial disclosures: Consultant, research support, and speakers bureau (AbbVie/Allergan, Alcon, Bausch Health, Espansione Group, Eyevance Pharmaceuticals, EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, InnovaMed, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Lombart, Marco, Nidek, Novartis, Presbia, Refocus Group, Strathspey Crown, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals)
author
Elizabeth Yeu, MD
  • Virginia Eye Consultants, Norfolk, Virginia
  • eyeu@vec2020
  • Financial disclosure: Consultant (AbbVie/Allergan, Bausch + Lomb, Dompé, Johnson & Johnson Vision, Kala Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals); Research/Director/Equity (Tarsus Pharmaceuticals)

NEXT IN THIS ISSUE