We noticed you’re blocking ads

Thanks for visiting CRSToday. Our advertisers are important supporters of this site, and content cannot be accessed if ad-blocking software is activated.

In order to avoid adverse performance issues with this site, please white list https://crstoday.com in your ad blocker then refresh this page.

Need help? Click here for instructions.

CONTOURA Vision Surgery in a High Myope

A 31-year-old male presented for a refractive consultation. He was getting married, and the consultation was a gift from his fiancée. He was very nearsighted and wore contact lenses and thick glasses that he had tired of. This patient was hoping that he could improve his prescription enough to reduce his dependence on spectacle correction.

After I examined the patient and took preoperative topographies with the WaveLight Topoloyzer VARIO diagnostic device (Alcon), I explained that I could treat him with this new topography-based technology, which I felt would be the best refractive treatment for him, given his prescription (highly myopic with significant astigmatism). I explained that CONTOURA Vision (Alcon) could treat not only his prescription, but also the irregularities on his cornea.

Pre- and Perioperatively

My staff and I obtained final presurgical topographic images for this patient prior to surgery with CONTOURA Vision, after instructing him to leave his contact lenses out for 2 weeks. On the day of surgery, we treated him with 8.00 D of sphere bilaterly in an uneventful procedure.

Postoperatively

On the first postoperative day, the patient achieved 20/15 UCVA in each eye (20/10 -2 OU SC). At his 2-week follow-up visit, the patient was seeing 20/15 UCVA in each eye separately, and 20/10 UCVA OU (Figures 1–10). At the time of this writing, the patient has zero postoperative symptoms, and he is so happy with his vision that his fiancée has scheduled surgery for herself. While achieving a postoperative vision of 20/10 is unusual in and of itself, achieving it in an eye with -9.00 D of myopia is impressive.

Figure 1. Preoperative topography OD shows WTR asymmetrical astigmatism.

Figure 2. The preoperative Zernicke higher-order aberration coma, OD.

Figure 3. Preoperative topography OS shows WTR asymmetrical astigmatism.

Figure 4. The preop Zernicke higherorder aberrations, OS. Note the coma.

Figure 5. The patient’s maps at 2 weeks postoperatively (comparison images).

Figure 6. The patient’s maps at 2 weeks postop (higher-order aberrations).

Figure 7. The patient’s topographic maps of the right eye at 2 weeks postoperatively (topographic images).

Figure 8. Two weeks postoperatively, left eye.

Figure 9. Two weeks postoperatively, left eye.

Figure 10. Two weeks postoperatively, right eye.

Discussion

Performing the CONTOURA Vision surgery itself is no different from performing any other LASIK procedure. The preoperative workup and planning are somewhat different, but worth it; I believe CONTOURA Vision results are better than with other treatment algorithms for these types of patients. The CONTOURA Vision procedure differs from wavefront-optimized ablations by using the Q-value of the patient’s own cornea, not a population-average Q-value. Plus, we can center the CONTOURA Vision treatment on the corneal apex rather than the center of the pupil. These factors combine to produce a more precise refractive treatment.

Michael Gordon, MD
  • partner in the Gordon Schanzlin New Vision Institute, a TLC Center, in San Diego, CA
  • financial disclosure: consultant to Alcon
  • mgordon786@aol.com

This information pertains to all WaveLight Excimer Laser Systems, including the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO WAVE, the ALLEGRETTO WAVE Eye-Q, and the WaveLight EX500.

Caution: Federal (U.S.) law restricts the WaveLight Excimer Laser Systems to sale by or on the order of a physician. Only practitioners who are experienced in the medical mangement and surgical treatment of the cornea, who have been trained in laser refractive surgery (including laser calibration and operation) should use a WaveLight Excimer Laser System.

Indications: FDA has approved the WaveLight Excimer Laser systems for use in laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) treatments for:

  • the reduction or elimination of myopia of up to –12.00 D and up to 6.00 D of astigmatism at the spectacle plane;
  • the reduction or elimination of hyperopia up to +6.00 D with and without astigmatic refractive errors up to 5.00 D at the spectacle plane, with a maximum manifest refraction spherical equivalent of +6.00 D;
  • the reduction or elimination of naturally occurring mixed astigmatism of up to 6.00 D at the spectacle plane; and
  • the wavefront-guided reduction or elimination of myopia of up to –7.00 D and up to 3.00 D of astigmatism at the spectacle plane.

In addition, FDA has approved the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO WAVE Eye-Q Excimer Laser System, when used with the WaveLight ALLEGRO Topolyzer and topography-guided treatment planning software for topographyguided LASIK treatments for the reduction or elimination of up to –9.00 D of myopia, or for the reduction or elimination of myopia with astigmatism, with up to –8.00 D of myopia and up to 3.00 D of astigmatism.

The WaveLight Excimer Laser Systems are only indicated for use in patients who are 18 years of age or older (21 years of age or older for mixed astigmatism) with documentation of a stable manifest refraction defined as ≤0.50 D of preoperative spherical equivalent shift over one year prior to surgery, exclusive of changes due to unmasking latent hyperopia.

Contraindications: The WaveLight Excimer Laser Systems are contraindicated for use with patients who:

  • are pregnant or nursing;
  • have a diagnosed collagen vascular, autoimmune or immunodeficiency disease;
  • have been diagnosed with keratoconus or if there are any clinical pictures suggestive of keratoconus;
  • are taking isotretinoin (Accutane*) and/or amiodarone hydrochloride (Cordarone*);
  • have severe dry eye;
  • have corneas too thin for LASIK;
  • have recurrent corneal erosion;
  • have advanced glaucoma; or
  • have uncontrolled diabetes.

Warnings: The WaveLight Excimer Laser Systems are not recommended for use with patients who have:

  • systemic diseases likely to affect wound healing, such as connective tissue disease, insulin dependent diabetes, severe atopic disease or an immunocompromised status;
  • a history of Herpes simplex or Herpes zoster keratitis;
  • significant dry eye that is unresponsive to treatment;
  • severe allergies;
  • a history of glaucoma;
  • an unreliable preoperative wavefront examination that precludes wavefront-guided treatment; or
  • a poor quality preoperative topography map that precludes topography-guided LASIK treatment.

The wavefront-guided LASIK procedure requires accurate and reliable data from the wavefront examination. Every step of every wavefront measurement that may be used as the basis for a wavefront-guided LASIK procedure must be validated by the user. Inaccurate or unreliable data from the wavefront examination will lead to an inaccurate treatment.

Topography-guided LASIK requires preoperative topography maps of sufficient quality to use for planning a topography-guided LASIK treatment. Poor quality topography maps may affect the accuracy of the topography-guided LASIK treatment and may result in poor vision after topography-guided LASIK.

Precautions: The safety and effectiveness of the WaveLight Excimer Laser Systems have not been established for patients with:

  • progressive myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism and/or mixed astigmatism, ocular disease, previous corneal or intraocular surgery, or trauma in the ablation zone;
  • corneal abnormalities including, but not limited to, scars, irregular astigmatism and corneal warpage;
  • residual corneal thickness after ablation of less than 250 microns due to the increased risk for corneal ectasia;
  • pupil size below 7.0 mm after mydriatics where applied for wavefront-guided ablation planning;
  • history of glaucoma or ocular hypertension of >23 mm Hg;
  • taking the medications sumatriptan succinate (Imitrex*);
  • corneal, lens and/or vitreous opacities including but not limited to cataract;
  • iris problems including, but not limited to, coloboma and previous iris surgery compromising proper eye tracking; or
  • taking medications likely to affect wound healing including (but not limited to) antimetabolites.

In addition, safety and effectiveness of the WaveLight Excimer Laser Systems have not been established for:

  • treatments with an optical zone <6.0 mm or
    >6.5 mm in diameter, or an ablation zone
    >9.0 mm in diameter; or
  • wavefront-guided treatment targets different from emmetropia (plano) in which the wavefront calculated defocus (spherical term) has been adjusted.

In the WaveLight Excimer Laser System clinical studies, there were few subjects with cylinder amounts >4 D and ≤6 D. Not all complications, adverse events, and levels of effectiveness may have been determined for this population.

Pupil sizes should be evaluated under mesopic illumination conditions. Effects of treatment on vision under poor illumination cannot be predicted prior to surgery.

Adverse Events and Complications

Myopia: In the myopia clinical study, 0.2% (2/876) of the eyes had a lost, misplaced, or misaligned flap reported at the 1 month examination.

The following complications were reported 6 months after LASIK: 0.9% (7/818) had ghosting or double images in the operative eye; 0.1% (1/818) of the eyes had a corneal epithelial defect.

Hyperopia: In the hyperopia clinical study, 0.4% (1/276) of the eyes had a retinal detachment or retinal vascular accident reported at the 3 month examination.

The following complications were reported 6 months after LASIK: 0.8% (2/262) of the eyes had a corneal epithelial defect and 0.8% (2/262) had any epithelium in the interface.

Mixed Astigmatism: In the mixed astigmatism clinical study, two adverse events were reported. The first event involved a patient who postoperatively was subject to blunt trauma to the treatment eye 6 days after surgery. The patient was found to have an intact globe with no rupture, inflammation or any dislodgement of the flap. UCVA was decreased due to this event. The second event involved the treatment of an incorrect axis of astigmatism. The axis was treated at 60 degrees instead of 160 degrees.

The following complications were reported 6 months after LASIK: 1.8% (2/111) of the eyes had ghosting or double images in the operative eye.

Wavefront-Guided Myopia: The wavefrontguided myopia clinical study included 374 eyes treated; 188 with wavefront-guided LASIK (Study Cohort) and 186 with Wavefront-Optimized LASIK (Control Cohort). No adverse events occurred during the postoperative period of the wavefront-guided LASIK procedures. In the Control Cohort, one subject undergoing traditional LASIK had the axis of astigmatism programmed as 115 degrees instead of the actual 155 degree axis. This led to cylinder in the left eye.

The following complications were reported 6 months after wavefront-guided LASIK in the Study Cohort: 1.2% (2/166) of the eyes had a corneal epithelial defect; 1.2% (2/166) had foreign body sensation; and 0.6% (1/166) had pain. No complications were reported in the Control Cohort.

Topography-Guided Myopia: There were six adverse events reported in the topographyguided myopia study. Four of the eyes experienced transient or temporary decreases in vision prior to the final 12 month follow-up visit, all of which were resolved by the final follow-up visit. One subject suffered from decreased vision in the treated eye, following blunt force trauma 4 days after surgery. One subject experienced retinal detachment, which was concluded to be unrelated to the surgical procedure.

Clinical Data

Myopia: The myopia clinical study included 901 eyes treated, of which 813 of 866 eligible eyes were followed for 12 months. Accountability at 3 months was 93.8%, at 6 months was 91.9%, and at 12 months was 93.9%. Of the 782 eyes that were eligible for the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) analysis of effectiveness at the 6-month stability time point, 98.3% were corrected to 20/40 or better, and 87.7% were corrected to 20/20 or better. Subjects who responded to a patient satisfaction questionnaire before and after LASIK reported the following visual symptoms at a “moderate” or “severe” level at least 1% higher at 3 months post-treatment than at baseline: visual fluctuations (28.6% vs. 12.8% at baseline).

Long-term risks of LASIK for myopia with and without astigmatism have not been studied beyond 12 months.

Hyperopia: The hyperopia clinical study included 290 eyes treated, of which 100 of 290 eligible eyes were followed for 12 months. Accountability at 3 months was 95.2%, at 6 months was 93.9%, and at 12 months was 69.9%. Of the 212 eyes that were eligible for the UCVA analysis of effectiveness at the 6-month stability time point, 95.3% were corrected to 20/40 or better, and 69.4% were corrected to 20/20 or better. Subjects who responded to a patient satisfaction questionnaire before and after LASIK reported the following visual symptoms as “much worse” at 6 months post-treatment: halos (6.4%); visual fluctuations (6.1%); light sensitivity (4.9%); night driving glare (4.2%); and glare from bright lights (3.0%).

Long-term risks of LASIK for hyperopia with and without astigmatism have not been studied beyond 12 months.

Mixed Astigmatism: The mixed astigmatism clinical study included 162 eyes treated, of which 111 were eligible to be followed for 6 months. Accountability at 1 month was 99.4%, at 3 months was 96.0%, and at 6 months was 100.0%. Of the 142 eyes that were eligible for the UCVA analysis of effectiveness at the 6-month stability time point, 97.3% achieved acuity of 20/40 or better, and 69.4% achieved acuity of 20/20 or better. Subjects who responded to a patient satisfaction questionnaire before and after LASIK reported the following visual symptoms at a “moderate” or “severe” level at least 1% higher at 3 months post-treatment than at baseline: sensitivity to light (52.9% vs. 43.3% at baseline); visual fluctuations (43.0% vs. 32.1% at baseline); and halos (42.3% vs. 37.0% at baseline).

Long-term risks of LASIK for mixed astigmatism have not been studied beyond 6 months.

Wavefront-Guided Myopia: The wavefrontguided myopia clinical study included 374 eyes treated; 188 with wavefront-guided LASIK (Study Cohort) and 186 with Wavefront-Optimized LASIK (Control Cohort). 166 of the Study Cohort and 166 of the Control Cohort were eligible to be followed at 6 months. In the Study Cohort, accountability at 1 month was 96.8%, at 3 months was 96.8%, and at 6 months was 93.3%. In the Control Cohort, accountability at 1 month was 94.6%, at 3 months was 94.6%, and at 6 months was 92.2%.

Of the 166 eyes in the Study Cohort that were eligible for the UCVA analysis of effectiveness at the 6-month stability time point, 99.4% were corrected to 20/40 or better, and 93.4% were corrected to 20/20 or better. Of the 166 eyes in the Control Cohort eligible for the UCVA analysis of effectiveness at the 6-month stability time point, 99.4% were corrected to 20/40 or better, and 92.8% were corrected to 20/20.

In the Study Cohort, subjects who responded to a patient satisfaction questionnaire before and after LASIK reported the following visual symptoms at a “moderate” or “severe” level at least 1% higher at 3 months post-treatment than at baseline: light sensitivity (47.8% vs. 37.2% at baseline) and visual fluctuations (20.0% vs. 13.8% at baseline). In the Control Cohort, the following visual symptoms were reported at a “moderate” or “severe” level at least 1% higher at 3 months post-treatment than at baseline: halos (45.4% vs. 36.6% at baseline) and visual fluctuations (21.9% vs. 18.3% at baseline).

Long-term risks of wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia with and without astigmatism have not been studied beyond 6 months.

Topography-Guided Myopia: The topographyguided myopia clinical study included 249 eyes treated, of which 230 eyes were followed for 12 months. Accountability at 3 months was 99.2%, at 6 months was 98.0%, and at 12 months was 92.4%. Of the 247 eyes that were eligible for the UCVA analysis at the 3-month stability time point, 99.2% were corrected to 20/40 or better, and 92.7% were corrected to 20/20 or better. Subjects who responded to a patient satisfaction questionnaire before and after LASIK reported the following visual symptoms as “marked” or “severe” at an incidence greater than 5% at 1 month after surgery: dryness (7% vs. 4% at baseline) and light sensitivity (7% vs. 5% at baseline). Visual symptoms continued to improve with time, and none of the visual symptoms were rated as being “marked” or “severe” with an incidence of at least 5% at 3 months or later after surgery.

Long-term risks of topography-guided LASIK for myopia with and without astigmatism have not been studied beyond 12 months.

Information for Patients: Prior to undergoing LASIK surgery with a WaveLight Excimer Laser System, prospective patients must receive a copy of the relevant Patient Information Booklet, and must be informed of the alternatives for correcting their vision, including (but not limited to) eyeglasses, contact lenses, photorefractive keratectomy, and other refractive surgeries.

Attention: Please refer to a current WaveLight Excimer Laser System Procedure Manual for a complete listing of the indications, complications, warnings, precautions, and side effects.

*Trademarks are property of their respective owners.