We noticed you’re blocking ads

Thanks for visiting CRSToday. Our advertisers are important supporters of this site, and content cannot be accessed if ad-blocking software is activated.

In order to avoid adverse performance issues with this site, please white list https://crstoday.com in your ad blocker then refresh this page.

Need help? Click here for instructions.

Cataract Surgery: Endophthalmitis Prophylaxis | Feb 2011

Prevention of Endophthalmitis

With proper draping, chemoprophylaxis,wound construction, and patients' education, the rate of endophthalmitis can be kept low.

Endophthalmitis is an uncommon complication of cataract surgery, with rates ranging from 0.07% to 0.13%, and more recently as high as 0.38%, as reported in a multicenter ESCRS study.1-3 Because of the devastating nature of endophthalmitis, pre-, peri-, and postoperative measures must be taken to minimize risk.

There are various putative approaches to endophthalmitis prophylaxis during cataract surgery. These methods include chemoprophylaxis, surgical draping, wound construction, and antibiotics. Studies examining the efficacy of each technique often produce widely ranging results due to the design of the investigation. Because of this uncertainty, surgical planning is based not only on the evidence of endophthalmitis prevention, but also the safety and cost effectiveness of the techniques reducing infective risk.

COMMON CAUSES
The most common organisms causing endophthalmitis are gram-positive bacteria, with coagulase-negative Staphylococcus comprising the majority of cases. In cataract surgery, the most likely sources of infection are the eyelids, eyelashes, and conjunctiva. With this knowledge, skin and lash preparation with povidone-iodine 10%, and cornea and conjunctival sac preparation with a 5% solution for a minimum of 3 minutes have become widely adopted measures in endophthalmitis prophylaxis. The strength of the data supporting surface preparation by this method is considered relatively high compared with other prophylactic techniques.4,5

Because the skin and lashes are likely sources of endophthalmitis, preoperative treatment of blepharitis and proper surgical draping are important considerations. Patients with blepharitis should be instructed to apply warm compresses and perform lid scrubs at least twice daily for 2 weeks prior to surgery. Topical antibiotics such as azithromycin ophthalmic solution 1% (AzaSite; Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) rubbed onto the lids/lashes once daily may also be considered. When performing surgical draping, eyelashes should be completely covered to minimize contamination of the wound with eyelid flora.

TOPICAL ANTIBIOTICS
Although there is a lack of evidence supporting the use of perioperative topical antibiotics, it has become a commonly performed measure for endophthalmitis prophylaxis. Fourth-generation fluoroquinolones, such as moxifloxacin (Vigamox and Moxeza; Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) and gatifloxacin (Zymar and Zymaxid; Allergan, Inc.), have become preferred choices due to their broad spectrum of coverage and excellent penetration and tolerability profile.6

WOUND CONSTRUCTION
Self-sealing clear corneal wounds are favored over sutured wounds, because the former are associated with greater comfort for patients, minimal induced astigmatism, and faster visual rehabilitation. Although the relationship between self-sealing corneal incisions and the increased risk of endophthalmitis remains uncertain, there is a general consensus that proper wound architecture can help to minimize the risk of infection.

Transient fluctuations in IOP can cause the wound to gape, allowing an influx of ocular surface fluid along with microorganisms. Paul Ernest, MD, has shown that properly constructed square corneal incisions resist this tendency to gape and self-seal more effectively.7 These wounds have also been shown by optical coherence tomography to provide advantageous architecture by self-sealing.8

When the potential for fluctuations in IOP is present, as with poorly constructed or damaged wounds or in patients who have had filtering procedures for glaucoma, the wound must be closed by suture or possibly adhesive.

OPHTHALMIC ADHESIVES
Recent studies involving a novel class of ophthalmic adhesives known as biodendrimers have demonstrated effective sealing of clear corneal incisions. Biodendrimer adhesives polymerize to form a smooth hydrogel surface over the cornea, providing a comfortable yet strong barrier. The leaking pressure of wounds sealed with a biodendrimer adhesive has been shown to be significantly higher than that of unsealed wounds in the human donor corneal model (142 mm Hg vs 78 mm Hg, respectively).9 Because forceful eyelid squeezing can raise IOP to nearly 90 mm Hg,10 biodendrimer adhesives may be a welcome alternative to sutures when commercially available.

ANTIBIOTICS
For the past few years, studies have supported the use of intracameral antibiotics in endophthalmitis prophylaxis. Recently, a prospective randomized multicenter ESCRS study using intracameral cefuroxime demonstrated a five- to sixfold increase in the risk for endophthalmitis when the intracameral antibiotic was not used.11 Although the intracameral administration of antibiotics has yet to be widely adopted in the United States, it may be more strongly recommended in the future. Further analysis must be made on the safety, cost-effectiveness, and type of intracameral antibiotics used.

During the postoperative period, patients should be instructed to instill a topical antibiotic until the epithelium is healed. Fluoroquinolones have become the topical topical antibiotic of choice in the United States. They have been shown to have a wide safety margin, good tissue penetration, rapid bactericidal effect, and a broad spectrum of coverage, particularly fourth-generation fluoroquinolones like those previously mentioned.6,12

CONCLUSION
Because of the potentially devastating effect of postoperative endophthalmitis, the cataract surgeon must have a thoughtful plan to minimize this risk. With proper draping, chemoprophylaxis, wound construction, and patient education, the rate of endophthalmitis can be kept low. Future studies involving intracameral antibiotics and wound adhesives may provide additional techniques to lower the rates of postoperative endophthalmitis even further.

Victor Chang, MD, is a clinical fellow of cornea, external disease, and refractive surgery at the Duke Eye Center in Durham, North Carolina. He acknowledged no financial interest in the products or companies mentioned herein. Dr. Chang may be reached at victor.chang@duke.edu.

Terry Kim, MD, is a professor of ophthalmology at Duke University School of Medicine and the associate director of corneal and refractive surgery services at Duke University Eye Center in Durham, North Carolina. He is a consultant to Alcon Laboratories, Inc.; Allergan, Inc.; Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Ista Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and Pfizer Inc. Dr. Kim may be reached at terry.kim@duke.edu.

  1. Kattan HM,Flynn HW,Jr.,Pflugfelder SC,et al.Nosocomial endophthalmitis survey.Current incidence of infection after intraocular surgery.Ophthalmology.1991;98(2):227-238.
  2. Javitt JC,Vitale S,Canner JK,et al.National outcomes of cataract extraction.Endophthalmitis following inpatient surgery.Arch Ophthalmol.1991;109(8):1085-1089.
  3. Seal DV,Barry P,Gettinby G,et al.ESCRS study of prophylaxis of postoperat ive endophthalmitis after cataract surgery:case for a European multicenter study.J Cataract Refract Surg.2006;32(3):396-406.
  4. Ciulla TA,Starr MB,Masket S.Bacterial endophthalmitis prophylaxis for cataract surgery:an evidencebased update.Ophthalmology.2002;109(1):13-24.
  5. Speaker MG,Menikoff JA.Prophylaxis of endophthalmitis with topical povidone-iodine.Ophthalmology. 1991;98(12):1769-1775.
  6. Kowalski RP,Dhaliwal DK,Karenchak LM,et al.Gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin:an in vitro susceptibility comparison to levofloxacin,ciprofloxacin,and ofloxacin using bacterial keratitis isolates.Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;136(3):500-505.
  7. Ernest PH,Fenzl R,Lavery KT,Sensoli A.Relative stability of clear corneal incisions in a cadaver eye model.J Cataract Refract Surg.1995;21(1):39-42.
  8. Fine IH,Hoffman RS,Packer M.Profile of clear corneal cataract incisions demonstrated by ocular coherence tomography.J Cataract Refract Surg.2007;33(1):94-97.
  9. Johnson CS,Wathier M,Grinstaff M,Kim T.In vitro sealing of clear corneal cataract incisions with a novel biodendrimer adhesive.Arch Ophthalmol.2009;127(4):430-434.
  10. Coleman DJ,Trokel S.Direct-recorded intraocular pressure variations in a human subject.Arch Ophthalmol.1969;82(5):637-640.
  11. Barry P,Seal DV,Gettinby G,et al.ESCRS study of prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery:Preliminary report of principal results from a European multicenter study.J Cataract Refract Surg.2006;32(3):407-410.
  12. Francis SM.New antibiotics for bacterial infections.Ophthalmol Clin North Am.2003;16(1):11-27.
Advertisement - Issue Continues Below
Publication Ad Publication Ad
End of Advertisement - Issue Continues Below

NEXT IN THIS ISSUE